Clayton County leads metro area in single-family rental homes

April 24, 2016

In his 13 years in Riverdale’s Sage Creek Estates, Keene Walker has witnessed a transformation.

The subdivision was once a close-knit community of homeowners who kept an eye on each other’s houses. These days, he said, “if I saw a strange car parked in the neighbor’s driveway … I wouldn’t know if someone’s breaking in or not.”

Walker is seeing more new faces in Sage Creek, and many of them belong to renters. It’s a reality that has him and others worried. Transient neighbors don’t have the same vested interest in the community, he said.

Walker’s concerns are echoed throughout Clayton County, where nearly a third of the single-family homes are occupied by renters. In Clayton and other metro Atlanta counties, the numbers have doubled since 2000. It’s a trend driven, in part, by the influx of rental companies that bought homes on the cheap during the economic downturn and are holding onto them.

Half of Clayton’s single-family rental homes are owned by such groups. Clayton leads metro area in single-family rental homes photo

“I like living around neighbors I know,” Walker said. “We believe in the concept that it takes a village. Now it’s like the houses are occupied but we’re not serving in the capacity of the village. The connection with neighbors is gone. ”

On average, more than one in five — 22 percent — of metro Atlanta’s single-family homes are rentals. At 31 percent, Clayton has the highest percentage of renters living in single-family homes in the region. That’s more than twice the rate of Cobb County, and close to double the rate of Fulton and Gwinnett. DeKalb County, with 22 percent, also doesn’t come close. Bruce McNeilage, co-founder of Kinloch Partners, talks on the phone outside one of rental properties his company owns in College Park 

Clayton Commission Chairman Jeff Turner is concerned about the high numbers of rental homes. The county’s community development department is working to attract more middle-class home buyers.

“Of course we want more families to own more homes, but we don’t know everyone’s circumstance,” Turner said. “They might be renting because of a job situation and some (people’s) credit might not allow them to own homes.”

Clayton renters run the gamut: working-class families looking to escape apartment living. Teachers. Single mothers. Flight attendants looking for crash pads near the airport.

The sharp rise in rental houses in Clayton since 2000 has affected everything from the school system to the county’s overall economic health. People are more transient and less willing to invest in the community, experts say. Businesses are less likely to move into communities with lower home ownership rates.

“We’ve become a county for people in transition,” said Ali Dadpay, who heads Clayton State University’s Center for Research and Economic Sustainability and Trends.

In 2008, a confluence of socioeconomic problems hit the county almost simultaneously. The school system was stripped of its accreditation in August of that year. Four months later, Clayton and the rest of the nation were in full-blown economic crisis. Clayton became ground zero for metro Atlanta’s housing collapse.

The value of houses in some neighborhoods plummeted. The purchases by investors helped stabilize prices.

“Clayton has gone through the ringer,” said Mark Vitner, senior economist for Wells Fargo in Charlotte.

Nationally, 39 metropolitan areas have as many — or more — renters in single family homes as metro Atlanta. Only the Cape Coral and Lakeland, Fla., and Augusta areas have a higher rate than Clayton.

Clayton’s high rate of rentals creates a burden on:

  • The school system. Clayton Public Schools Superintendent Luvenia Jackson says the increased presence of renters in single-family homes affects everything from testing to student turnover. At 31.5 percent, Clayton has the highest student mobility rate — students coming and going — of any school system in Georgia.
  • Social programs. The Neighborhood Stabilization Program has bought, rehabbed and resold more than 200 homes in Clayton to families in the last six years, but deep-pocketed investors have made that mission harder now. “We’ll see vacant homes and try to contact the bank and they don’t even want to talk to us now because they’re packaging up those homes and selling them in bulk,” NSP manager Carol Seaton said.
  • Individual homeowners. Community activist Derrick Boazman said the flood of single-family rentals hurts future home ownership in the county. Investors are buying homes “for the sole purpose of extracting money out of the county,” said Boazman, a former Atlanta City Councilman “They could care less about the stability of the county.”

 

Boazman also noted that the county is predominantly black. It was hurt by a rash of foreclosures in part because of the huge amount of sub-prime loans, a legacy of redlining.

Home ownership is traditionally a way to build wealth. That wealth allows homeowners to borrow against a mortgage to pay for college or start a business.

There’s nothing wrong with having rentals in a community, said John O’Callaghan, president and CEO of the Atlanta Neighborhood Development Partnership. Problems arise when the dynamics of an area change quickly.

“Every neighborhood needs a mix of homeowners and rental,” he said. “I worry in Clayton County that you don’t have the right mix.”

Because there are so many rentals that aren’t for sale, the housing market remains tight, he said. Fewer sales keep property values down.

Patrick Ejike, head of the county community development department, said as Clayton attracts more firms, creates more jobs and paychecks increase that will help to attract more people who’ll be able to buy instead of rent.

Boazman called on county leaders to address the proliferation of rental homes — and soon.

“Clayton won’t be able to sustain itself if it does not take appropriate legislative action to correct this imbalance,” he said. “They’ve got to look legislatively at how do you limit the number of homes that can be owned by corporations? … They’ve got to know who owns Clayton County.”

By Bruce McNeilage July 28, 2025
To view this post on "X" please click this link: https://x.com/YahooFinance/status/1949937657582407929
By Bruce McNeilage July 28, 2025
There have been a lot of headlines about the number of investors, both large and small, snapping up homes as investments. Kinloch Partners co-founder & CEO Bruce McNeilage explains who these investors are and why so many are getting into housing. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Asking for a Trend here . Click the image above to watch the entire video. 00:00 Speaker A When we talk about these investors moving in, what kind of investors are we talking about, Bruce? Are we talking about relatively are these smaller investors, or these private equity players? Who are they? 00:18 Bruce Sure, they're all the above, right? They're small mom and pop investors. They're buying four and five houses here and there. They're mid-tier companies like us. We'd like to do another 100 to 200 houses by the end of the year. They're larger players, and then there are the ones in between. Now, family offices, sovereign wealth funds, the hedge funds, the REITs, everybody is coming into the market right now. There's been too much money on the sidelines, and we're really starting to see these builders benefit because they have a lot of excess inventory, and folks like us can come in, clean up their inventory here in the next few months, and really uh help them with their profits and buy up their inventory. 01:06 Speaker A So that's interesting, Bruce. So part of the trend here is its home builders have a lot of inventory. That's part of the the driver here. 01:18 Bruce Yeah, absolutely. Mom and pops are having a tough time qualifying for mortgages, right? The interest rates are just too high in the last 52 weeks. You know, you look at Freddie Mac numbers, they've basically stayed the same. We're hovering just under 7%. People cannot afford mortgages right now. So the next best thing is to rent a brand new house. Well, who do you rent a brand new house from? The people that have bought one, or the people that have built one. And so we're really offering something that most people can't get, a brand new house, instead of buying it, you're renting it. 02:07 Speaker A And the smaller investor, Bruce, in particular, that this was really the trend the kind of journal pointed out here, is there a reason right now, Bruce, that smaller investors would be more active? 02:25 Bruce Yeah, sure. So small investors can borrow money from credit unions. They can borrow against their 401k. They can do a lot of different things that larger investors aren't going to do. And when you see the the price of houses coming down, when you see the inventory come uh going up, and when you also see all these builder incentives, it really helps a small investor get in the game, so to speak, because they are getting these discounts from these builders. 03:05 Speaker A And is the business model there, Bruce, for the smaller investor? It's what, you move in, buy a home, make some modest renovations, rent it with the aim of of one day selling it. Is that the idea? 03:22 Bruce Yeah, most people are looking at either buying a new house or what I call a used house and fixing it up. You cash flow it for a number of years, let's say three to five years. It goes up in value, and then you sell it. A lot of people are just in this for the capital gains. Some people are in it for the income and capital gains, but the name of the game is to have positive cash flow from day one and then sell it at a profit at the end. 03:54 Speaker A Is there are there advantages, Bruce, a smaller investor, relatively would have over a private equity player? 04:08 Bruce Yeah, I think they can be nimble. I don't think they have the same rules. They certainly don't have investment committees. And so they can choose to buy a house, rent a house, sell a house, and they can pay what they want to pay. You know, again, they don't have a mandate from an investment committee. So if they want to buy something with a lower cap rate, if they want to buy something with a higher cap rate or something big, small, uh you know, older, uh newer, they can be as nimble as they want where the larger funds can't. They have mandates. You know, they have a buy box and uh and and they've got some restrictions, and we do too. 04:57 Speaker A I'm sure, Bruce, there are some folks who are watching this right now who think, well, hold on a second. Doesn't this trend, doesn't this thing that Bruce and Josh are talking about ultimately make it that much tougher for regular Americans, Bruce, to come in and bid and compete?  05:25 Bruce Yeah, so you would think that, but what we're doing is we're not taking inventory out of the market. For us, we're building brand new houses, not taking inventory out of the market. And then these houses are available in the MLS. You know, you buy houses from the different large builders. Anybody can buy those houses today. It's just people are not. So investors are coming in, cleaning up this inventory, buying the houses, but quite frankly, they're available to everyone. It's just people can't afford them. So it's buying up the houses and making more stock available again, not to buy, but for people that can't buy but to rent.
By Bruce McNeilage July 28, 2025
High interest rates and prices aren’t deterring firms from snapping up single-family properties
By Bruce McNeilage July 11, 2025
Institutional ownership of rental houses will likely continue for several key reasons:
By Bruce McNeilage June 25, 2025
Why 2025 may test the resilience of commercial real estate as nearly $1 trillion in loans come due.
Show More